85 Iowa 432 | Iowa | 1892
The third division of the defendants’ answer pleaded the following facts as a prior adjudication, viz.: That at the same time that the defendant sheriff levied on a portion of the stock of goods under the attachment sued out in the case of A. Louis & Co. v. J. H. Carver & Co., he also levied on another portion or part of the same stock of goods in another case, pending in the same court, wherein Farwell, Miller & Co. were plaintiffs and J. H. Carver & Co. defendants. That -the writs of attachment in the two cases were
I. There is no room for doubt as to the rules of law applicable in determining whether or not the facts
II. The fourth count of the answer pleads substantially the same facts as are set out in the third count, and is demurred to upon the same
The judgment of the district court is aeeiemed.