Woods v. State

Jun 15, 1926
8 Div. 362.
Versions:109 So. 171
21 Ala. App. 436
1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 196
SAMFORD, J.

The rulings of the court on the admission of testimony were patently free from error.

The argument of the solicitor, to which exception was taken was legitimate.

Refused charge 2 omits the doctrine of retreat. Refused charge 3 was the’ general charge, and refused charge 4 invades the province of the jury. They were all properly refused. Jones v. State, 20 Ala. App. 660, 104 So. 771; Tatum v. State, 20 Ala. App. 436, 102 So. 726.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.