Woods v. State

Jun 15, 1926
8 Div. 362.
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Samford
SAMFORD, J.

The rulings of the court on the admission ‍​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‍of testimony were patently free from error.

The argument of the solicitor, to which exception was taken ‍​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‍was legitimate.

Refused charge 2 omits the doctrine of retreat. Refused charge 3 was the’ general charge, and ‍​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‍refused charge 4 invades the province of the jury. They were all properly refused. Jones v. ‍​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‍State, 20 Ala. App. 660, 104 So. 771; Tatum v. State, 20 Ala. App. 436, 102 So. 726.

There is no ‍​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‍error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.