History
  • No items yet
midpage
Woods v. Lewis
116 S.E. 542
Ga. Ct. App.
1923
Check Treatment
Stephens, J.

Upon an issue formed oh a traverse to a garnishee’s answer an alleged admission of the garnishee, made during the month of September, that the defendant, who was his cropper, would have a certain amount of the crop, consisting of an approximate amount of cotton and of an appropriate amount of corn, as the cropper’s share of the crop for that year raised upon the garnishee’s land, was susceptible to the construction that the crop had reached the point of development where its yield was capable of definite ascertainment; and such alleged admission can not be adjudged to be a mere speculative opinion or prophecy by the garnishee as to the yield of the crop. This evidence, when taken in connection with other evidence adduced, authorized the verdict found for the plaintiff against the garnishee.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J.. and Bell, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Woods v. Lewis
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 17, 1923
Citation: 116 S.E. 542
Docket Number: 13896
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.