History
  • No items yet
midpage
Woodruff v. Gunkel
202 Okla. 408
| Okla. | 1950
|
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error have appealed from a judgment *409of the trial court in favor of plaintiffs below, defendants in error here, in forcible entry and detainer. The defendants in error have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as frivolous. The plaintiffs in error have filed no response to the motion to dismiss, although requested to do so by the court, and have offered no excuse for such failure. In Gartrell v. Federal Land Bank of Wichita, Kan., 180 Okla. 523, 71 P. 2d 489, we said:

“Where a motion to dismiss is filed upon the ground that the appeal is without merit and for delay only, and the court calls for a response to such motion and none is filed, and no excuse offered for such failure, this court may, in its discretion, dismiss the appeal.”

Appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Woodruff v. Gunkel
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Feb 7, 1950
Citation: 202 Okla. 408
Docket Number: No. 34439
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.