Woodliff v. State
103 Ga. 552
Ga.
1897
Check Treatment
Little, J.

As applied to the evidence, the instructions complained of were not, when taken in'connection with the remainder of the charge, objectionable, or prejudicial to the accused; and as a whole the charge was a full, fair, and clear exposition of the law applicable to the case. No new or unsettled question of law is. in volved in the present case; there was (no error in admitting evidence; the verdict of the jury was amply supported by the evidence, and is not contrary to law.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.