History
  • No items yet
midpage
217 A.3d 192
Pa.
2019

MICHAEL WILLIAM WOODFORD AND OPTIONS INSURANCE AGENCY v. PENNSYLVANIA INSURANCE DEPARTMENT

No. 172 MAL 2019

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

August 13, 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issues, as stated by Petitioners, are:

  1. With respect to a question of statutory construction that the Insurance Commissioner and the Commonwealth Court readily acknowledge was a “matter of first impression“, did the Commonwealth Court Panel err when it afforded deference to the Insurance Department‘s interpretation of an ambiguous statute that was penal in nature instead of strictly construing the statute against the Insurance Department, as required by Pennsylvania law?
  2. Does the Commonwealth Court Panel‘s holding conflict with other intermediate appellate court opinions in holding that Petitioners were not entitled to summary judgment notwithstanding the fact that the Insurance Department failed to reply to Petitioners’ motion for summary judgment and failed to submit evidence to contradict a sworn affidavit submitted by Petitioners?

The Application for Relief in the Nature of a Motion for Stay is DENIED.

Case Details

Case Name: Woodford, M., Pets v. Insurance Dept.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Aug 13, 2019
Citations: 217 A.3d 192; 172 MAL 2019 (Granted)
Docket Number: 172 MAL 2019 (Granted)
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Woodford, M., Pets v. Insurance Dept., 217 A.3d 192