History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wood v. Riddle
14 Or. 254
Or.
1886
Check Treatment
Strahan, J.

The respondent applied to the county court of Douglas County, for a license to sell spirituous liquors by retail. The appellant, with others, remonstrated. License was granted, and appellant procured a writ of review. Upon a hearing in the circuit court, the writ was dismissed, from which judgment this appeal is taken.

Douglas County is not a party to this proceeding, and for that reason it is fatally defective. The county court, representing the county, granted the license, and the county received the money. In all analogous cases in this state,from Thompsons. Multnomah County, 2 Or. 34, to Pruden v. Grant County, 12 Or. 308, the county, or other public corporation whose acts are to be reviewed, must be a defendant, and must have the privilege of being heard before its acts can be annulled on writ of review. (Simon v. Portland Common Council, 9 Or. 437; Worcester and Nashua R. R. Co. v. R. R. Commis., 118 Mass. 561; Crawford v. Township Board, 22 Mich. 405.

For this reason the court below did not err in .dismissing said writ, and its judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Wood v. Riddle
Court Name: Oregon Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 6, 1886
Citation: 14 Or. 254
Court Abbreviation: Or.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.