History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wood v. Kahn
198 F. 403
2d Cir.
1912
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We agree fully with the opinion of Judge Hough that the method of sawing a diamond described and claimed does not involve invention. The fact that the object to be divided is of great value does not change what would otherwise be mechanical skill into invention. It might, as pointed out, require unusual courage for the operator .to risk such a process on so valuable an article, but courage is not patentable.

We deem it unnecessary to add anything to the opinion of the Circuit Court.

The decree is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Wood v. Kahn
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: May 31, 1912
Citation: 198 F. 403
Docket Number: No. 190
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.