History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wood v. Davis
11 U.S. 271
SCOTUS
1812
Check Treatment
Marshall, Ch. J.

Stated that the opinion of the Court to be, that the verdict and judgment in the case of Susan Davis against Swann, were not conclusive evidence in the present case. There was no privity between Swann and Wood; they were to be considered as perfectly distinct persons.. Wood had a right tp defend his own title, which lie did not derive from Swann.

Judgment reversed-

Case Details

Case Name: Wood v. Davis
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 10, 1812
Citation: 11 U.S. 271
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.