History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wood v. Amer
251 Conn. 908
Conn.
1999
Check Treatment

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 601 (AC 18410), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) the ‘Brush deed’ contained two separate restrictive covenants, and that, therefore, the grantor intended that only one house was to be located on either lot 10 or lot 11; and (2) the statute of limitations contained in General Statutes § 52-575a had not expired with respect to the plaintiffs claim of a violation of a covenant not to build?”
Stanley A. Twardy, Jr., Deborah S. Gordon and Mario R. Borelli, in opposition. Decided October 6, 1999

Case Details

Case Name: Wood v. Amer
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Oct 6, 1999
Citation: 251 Conn. 908
Docket Number: SC 16199
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.