History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wood v. . Wise
102 N.E. 1117
NY
1913
Check Treatment

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion of WOODWARD, J., below. First question certified answered in the affirmative; second question not answered; third and fourth questions answered in the negative; fifth question answered, a new trial should not have been granted.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., WERNER, HISCOCK, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK and MILLER. Absent: GRAY, J.

Case Details

Case Name: Wood v. . Wise
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 29, 1913
Citation: 102 N.E. 1117
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.