History
  • No items yet
midpage
Womeldorf v. Steinbergen
1 Ohio Ch. 41
Ohio
1832
Check Treatment
COLLETT, J.

was of opinion that the challenge could not be received.

WRIGHT, J. was in favor of admitting it. Owing to this division of opinion, the challenge was not received, and the juror was sworn. •

A verdict was taken for the plaintiff for $227.36.

Judges HITCHCOCK and WRIGHT were of opinion the challenge was admissible. Judges COLLETT and LANE were of opinion it was inadmissible.

Owing to this division, the motion for a new trial failed, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff on the verdict.

Case Details

Case Name: Womeldorf v. Steinbergen
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 15, 1832
Citation: 1 Ohio Ch. 41
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.