History
  • No items yet
midpage
Womack v. State
162 Tex. Crim. 435
Tex. Crim. App.
1956
Check Treatment
WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.

*436The complaint and information were filed on February 14, 1955, and bear the signature of the county attorney.

A motion for arrest of judgment was filed and, upon the hearing on such motion, it was stipulated that the complaint was not signed nor sworn to before the county attorney before it was filed or before the information was filed, and the jurat of such complaint showing that it was signed and sworn to before the county attorney on February 14, 1955, was not true.

In view of such stipulations it is evident that at the time the information was filed and presented, there was no valid complaint which could form a basis for the information. A valid complaint is a prerequisite to a valid information. Art. 415 C.C.P.; Byrom v. State, 158 Tex. Cr. R. 427, 256 S.W. 2d 853.

A complaint sworn to after the information has been presented will not support a conviction. Billingslea v. State, 160 Tex. Cr. Rep. 244„ 268 S.W. 2d 668; Baker v. State, 159 Tex. Cr. R. 491, 265 S.W. 2d 600.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Womack v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jan 25, 1956
Citation: 162 Tex. Crim. 435
Docket Number: No. 27,967
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.