History
  • No items yet
midpage
Woliner v. Woliner
344 A.2d 781
| N.J. | 1975
|
Check Treatment
68 N.J. 324 (1975)
344 A.2d 781

ESTELLE WOLINER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JACK WOLINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 8, 1975.
Decided September 23, 1975.

Mr. Bernard Rudd argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Rudd and Ackerman, attorneys; Mr. Neil Braun on the brief).

Mr. Ernest Prupis argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Weltchek, Prupis and Ritz, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Woliner v. Woliner
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Sep 23, 1975
Citation: 344 A.2d 781
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.