Wolff v. Meyer

76 N.J.L. 574 | N.J. | 1908

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Bogeet, Yredenburgh, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 10.

For reversal—Yooehees, Yeoom, J.J. 2.