Wolfe v. TeeleWolfe v. Teele
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Keniry, J.), entered April 3, 1995 in Saratoga County, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Plaintiff Floyd Wolfe (hereinafter Wolfe) slipped and fell on an icy parking lot at the offices of his employer. The slip and fall occurred while Wolfe, acting within his scope of employment, was sanding the parking lot in an attempt to eliminate the icy conditions. Plaintiffs commenced this personal injury action against the owners of the premises; Wolfe’s employer was the lessee of the premises. Defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, inter alia, on the basis that an individual cannot recover in a common-law personal injury action as a result of being injured by the specific hazard the individual had undertaken to eliminate. Defendants appeal the denial of their motion.
We reverse. The Court of Appeals has held that the owners of real property are not responsible to one injured through a dangerous condition which condition the injured individual had set about to remedy (see, Kowalsky v Conreco Co.,
Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, motion granted, summary judgment awarded to defendants and complaint dismissed.