Wolfe v. StateWolfe v. State
Having reviewed all issues which Wolfe has raised in this appeal, the only issue of merit concerns the conviction for keeping a house of ill fame. In Warren v. State, 572 So.2d 1376 (Fla. 1991) our supreme court overturned the “ill fame” statute as unconstitutionally vague. This opinion reversed earlier supreme court and district court of appeal decisions interpreting that same statute as constitutional. The trial judge, in affirming the conviction, obviously relied upon those earlier cases as the Warren opinion had not yet been filed.
We reverse the conviction and sentence for keeping a house of ill fame and direct the trial court to dismiss that charge. We determine, however, that the evidence does establish that Wolfe is guilty of the offense of keeping a house of prostitution under
Reversed and remanded with directions to the trial court.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.
Notes
That section in relevant part provides:
(2) It is unlawful in the state:
(a) To keep, set up, maintain, or operate any place, structure, building, or conveyance for the purposes of lewdness, assignation, or prostitution.