History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wolf v. Christman
202 Pa. 475
Pa.
1902
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

All of the appellant’s numerous assignments of error, except one, are to the judge’s findings or refusals to find facts. It is sufficient to say that the judge was amply sustained by evidence, and we see no reason to question his conclusions.

The remaining assignment to the conclusions of law cannot be sustained. The judge found that the plaintiff bought in reliance on a warranty or express representation as to the depth of the lot, which takes the case out of the rule of caveat emptor.

J udgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Wolf v. Christman
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 19, 1902
Citation: 202 Pa. 475
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 269
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.