Witt v. State

May 14, 1980
79-621
Reporters:
Before:
Anstead, Beranek, Hersey (per curiam)

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/defendant appeals, asserting error in the denial of his motion to suppress certain evidence found by an arresting police officer during an inventory search of his automobile. After a jury trial at which a gun found ‍​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‍in defendant‘s car was introduced, defendant was found guilty of robbery with a firearm.

Although appellant moved to suppress the gun prior to trial, he failed to object to the gun‘s introduction at trial. Appellant has, therefore, failed ‍​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‍to preserve the alleged error for appellate review. O‘Berry v. Wainwright, 300 So.2d 740 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Jones v. State, 360 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

We have considered the other points raised by appellant in support of his ‍​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‍appeal and find no error demonstrated. The conviction and judgment below are hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., concur.