87 N.C. 176 | N.C. | 1882
The only exception taken by the plaintiff on the trial was to the admission in evidence of the deed from Jason H. Withrow to his wife, and that presents the only question for our determination.
Our opinion is the deed was improperly admitted. It was (178) irrelevant testimony and should have been excluded upon the principal of res inter alios actae. His Honor was probably controlled in his ruling by the decision in Brink v. Black,
In Holmesly v. Hogue,
Error. Venire de novo.
Cited: Loftin v. Hill,
(179)