History
  • No items yet
midpage
Witherspoon v. Swift Bros.
37 S.E. 976
Ga.
1901
Check Treatment
Lewis, J.

1. It was too late,,after an attachment case had proceeded to final judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant therein, to file a claim in resistance to a levy entered upon the attachment and not designed to arrest the progress of the execution. ;•

2. Were it otherwise, there was in the present case no error in dismissing the alleged claim,, the same being evidenced only by a paper purporting to be an affidavit, which was not attested by any officer.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Witherspoon v. Swift Bros.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 28, 1901
Citation: 37 S.E. 976
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.