History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA
585 Pa. 44
| Pa. | 2005
|
Check Treatment
887 A.2d 1238 (2005)

Mark and Elizabeth WISNISKI t/d/b/a Saturn Surplus
v.
BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA, Donald Blood and Will Rineer, EMC Ins. Co. and Scott W. Ahlstrom
Appeal of Brown & Brown Ins. Co. of PA, Donald Blood and Will Rineer.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued December 5, 2005.
Decided December 21, 2005.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Superior Court is hereby VACATED. The matter is remanded to the Superior Court for reconsideration of whether a duty exists by applying the five-prong test as set forth in Althaus v. Cohen, 562 Pa. 547, 756 A.2d 1166 (2000), and for an opinion in support thereof.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Justice NIGRO did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Case Details

Case Name: Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 21, 2005
Citation: 585 Pa. 44
Docket Number: Appeal 30 MAP 2005
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.