69 Pa. Commw. 115 | Pa. Commw. Ct. | 1982
Opinion by
In the instant case, the Claimant,
The Commonwealth, however, argues that the referee’s omission was not prejudicial to the Claimant and, therefore, under our holding in Robinson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 60 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 275, 431 A.2d 378 (1981), no remand is required. In Robinson we
Being satisfied that under Katz and Robinson Claimant is entitled to a remand, it will be so ordered.
Order
The order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in the within matter is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the attached opinion.
John A. Wise.
The author of this opinion dissented.