History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wire, Inc. v. Bruckman
253 A.D. 350
N.Y. App. Div.
1938
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The petitioner, who is not a licensee, has no standing to maintain this proceeding enjoining action that might be taken against parties who are licensees. Furthermore, the State Liquor Authority has jurisdiction under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law to entertain proceedings against licensees. Since it has such jurisdiction, the order should not have been granted even if it be assumed that the jurisdiction would be erroneously exercised. *351For such error, if error it be, a licensee might, in a proper case, seek relief by certiorari.

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Wire, Inc. v. Bruckman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 18, 1938
Citation: 253 A.D. 350
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.