History
  • No items yet
midpage
Winthrop v. Carlton
8 Mass. 456
Mass.
1812
Check Treatment
* By the Court.

The plea discloses no sufficient cause of abating the writ. Non constat that judgment will be *380rendered against the defendant in the other suit. That process depending may well support a motion for a continuance of this action; and while the action shall stand continued for such cause, it will not be proper for the plaintiff to tax his costs of travel and attendance.

G. Sullivan for the plaintiff. J. E. Smith for the defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: Winthrop v. Carlton
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1812
Citation: 8 Mass. 456
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.