History
  • No items yet
midpage
Winter v. Beal, Lynch & Co.
83 N.Y.2d 944
NY
1994
Check Treatment

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order which affirmed that part of the Supreme Court’s determination denying plaintiffs cross motion to amend the amended complaint, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order sought to be appealed from *945does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Case Details

Case Name: Winter v. Beal, Lynch & Co.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 16, 1994
Citation: 83 N.Y.2d 944
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.