History
  • No items yet
midpage
Winston v. Moseley
35 Mo. 146
Mo.
1864
Check Treatment
Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a petition for a mandamus. Winston was, prior to December, 1863, Commissioner of the permanent seat of Government. In December, 1863, the General Assembly elected another person commissioner, who received a commission as such. Winston claims that he is still lawfully in office, and presented to the auditor an account for a quarter’s salary, which the auditor refused to allow. Winston asks of this court a writ of mandamus, commanding the auditor to audit and allow the account.

The application for. a mandamus is refused. It is no part of the duty of the auditor to determine the right to the office. It is sufficient to justify him in refusing to audit the account of Winston, that another person is in fact the officer holding the commission. The right to the office cannot be *147determined as a collateral matter in this proceeding. The law provides a direct proceeding for such cases.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.-

Case Details

Case Name: Winston v. Moseley
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Mar 15, 1864
Citation: 35 Mo. 146
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.