History
  • No items yet
midpage
Winograd v. Epstein
104 N.Y.S. 1150
N.Y. App. Div.
1907
Check Treatment

If there was a breach of the contract by the defendant, the plaintiff was entitled to recover the payments made and the difference between the contract price and the value of the goods at the time and place of. delivery. The payment of fifty dollars was conceded, and the évidence that the goods were worth fifty dollars more than the contract.price was not disputed. It" was, therefore, error to give judgment, for only the sum Of fifty dollars. Judgment "of the Municipal Ccjurt reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Winograd v. Epstein
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1907
Citation: 104 N.Y.S. 1150
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.