History
  • No items yet
midpage
Winnemore v. Mathews
45 Ala. 449
Ala.
1871
Check Treatment
B. F. SAFFOLD, J.

The summons was not signed by the clerk, and the judgment was by default. The summons must be signed by-the clerk, and it is his signature which gives it validity. — -Rev. Code, §§ 2559, 2560; Stone v. Harris, Minor’s Rep. 32; Browder v. Gaston & Wellborn, 30 Ala. 677; Costley v. Driver, present term.

The complaint does not contain a substantial cause of action. By the omission to state who did the work, the plaintiff might recover money to which he had no claim whatever, and another is entitled.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Winnemore v. Mathews
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jan 15, 1871
Citation: 45 Ala. 449
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.