37 N.Y.S. 1092 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1896
This action was brought to recover the amount of a deposit alleged to have been made by one Henry Gebhard, deceased, in the defendant’s bank in the name of “ Henry Gebhard, in trust for Louise Unger,” a pass book for which was issued by the-defendant. After Gebhard’s death the plaintiff demanded of the defendant the
It is difficult to see upon' what theory or basis the court could amend an order made at. a previous court held by another judge in the manner attempted,to be done here! No such relief appears to. have been asked for by the original order, and the judge granting the original motion is made to decide a question which never was presented to him. While it may be true that an order may he amended to conform to a decision, it is somewhat difficult to understand how an order can be amended so as to make the court rule upon a question which has never been presented to' it. We do not hereby mean to intimate that even if an independent .application had been made, it should have been granted.
We think the order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Barrett, Rumsev, Williams and Patterson, JJ., concurred..
i Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.