History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wingo v. Louisiana
471 U.S. 1030
SCOTUS
1985
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Sup. Ct. La.;

Sup. Ct. La.;

Sup. Ct. Ala.;

C. A. 5th Cir.;

Ct. Crim. App. Okla.;

Sup. Ct. Ind.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.; and

Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 84-5339, 457 So. 2d 1159; No. 84-6073, 459 So. 2d 510; No. 84-6224, 459 So. 2d 959; No. 84-6250, 744 F. 2d 1091; No. 84-6251, 690 P. 2d 463; No. 84-6285, 470 N. E. 2d 666; No. 84-6348, 457 So. 2d 1012; No. 84-6442, 456 So. 2d 404.






Concurrence in Part

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.

Case Details

Case Name: Wingo v. Louisiana
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 15, 1985
Citation: 471 U.S. 1030
Docket Number: No. 84-5339; No. 84-6073; No. 84-6224; No. 84-6250; No. 84-6251; No. 84-6285; No. 84-6348; No. 84-6442
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In