History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wingate v. Brooks
3 Cal. 112
Cal.
1853
Check Treatment
Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court, Wells, Justice, concurring.

This was an action on a statute bond, given to the sheriff, and by him assigned to the plaintiff.

At the time, the defendant moved for a nonsuit, which was refused, and the refusal is here assigned for error.

I think the nonsuit was properly refused. ' The first ground *113for the motion is not well taken. The bond seems to me substantially to conform to the requisitions of the act, and no variation has been pointed out.

The succeeding grounds are based upon the action of the court in the case in which the bond was given. The errors of that case, if any, cannot be reviewed in this.

The judgment is affirmed, with ten per cent, damages and costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Wingate v. Brooks
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 15, 1853
Citation: 3 Cal. 112
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.