midpage

Wingard v. StateWingard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
May 17, 1968
No. 68-25
Versions:210 So. 2d 472
1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5570
PER CURIAM.

Petitioner is appealing from the summary denial of his Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 motion. In order to obtain post-conviction relief under Rule No. 1 (now R.Cr.P. 1.850, 33 F.S.A.), it is necessary that one seeking such relief be in custody by virtue of the sentence appealed from. An appeal from a judgment denying a motion for post-conviction relief under Rule No. 1 becomes moot upon completion of the service of the sentence. Desrosiers v. State, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 834; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 243; Young v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 622. It appears from the record that the sentence appealed from has already expired. Accordingly, petitioner’s appeal must be dismissed.

LILES, C. J., and ALLEN and PIERCE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Wingard v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 17, 1968
Citations: 210 So. 2d 472; 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5570; No. 68-25
Docket Number: No. 68-25
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In