11 Ind. 516 | Ind. | 1859
This was a prosecution for “keeping a room to be used for gaming.” Trial, conviction, &c.
The affidavit and information state the names of certain persons who gamed, and state that other persons did
It is now objected that, upon such disclosure, the defendant was entitled to a verdict.
It was not necessary to have set forth the names of those who gamed. Sowle v. The State, at this term
Proof having been made that, with the knowledge of the defendant, certain persons had gamed in his room, it was a question for the jury whether it was kept by him for that purpose. Armstrong v. The State, 4 Blackf. 247.
Per Curiam. — The judgment is affirmed, &c.
Ante, 492.