History
  • No items yet
midpage
Winder Bros. v. Sterling
14 S.W.2d 802
Tex. Comm'n App.
1929
Check Treatment
NICKELS, J.

Relators in their motion for rehearing complain that we did not pass “upon applicant’s contention that the statute * * * is violative of the Constitution of the United States, as amended by the Fifteenth Amendment thereto.” We assume that counsel intended to refer to the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Be that as it may, no reference to the Federal Constitution is made in the petition in mandamus.

But if the contention were made, the re-suits stated in our original opinion for denying the claim of lack of due process required in the state Constitution would cause us to make a like holding in respect to due process under the Federal Constitution.

The other matters presented in the motion for rehearing were considered by us originally, and upon reconsideration We adhere to the views then expressed.

Case Details

Case Name: Winder Bros. v. Sterling
Court Name: Texas Commission of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 13, 1929
Citation: 14 S.W.2d 802
Docket Number: Motion No. 8405; No. 1127-5064
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Comm'n App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.