History
  • No items yet
midpage
Winchell v. Latham
7 Cow. 367
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1827
Check Treatment

On a motion for a re-taxation of costs: The conit de°*ded ^at lowing items were allowable to the plaintiff, on a verdict recovered against the defendant:

Counsel for perusing and amending declaration; and-three copies of the declaration.

But they disallowed the following:

Braft and engrossing H. P. record, with pleadings, &c., because this had been paid for by the defendant at a previous circuit, on putting off the trial; and a testatum execution, on the ground that the defendant, both when the ' ° 1 action was commenced, and when the costs were taxed, ™ ^ county of Oneida, where the venue was laid.

Case Details

Case Name: Winchell v. Latham
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1827
Citation: 7 Cow. 367
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.