History
  • No items yet
midpage
Winchaus Hayes v. United States
671 F. App'x 228
| 4th Cir. | 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Winchaus Angelo Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Lynn Van Valkenburg, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

Winchaus Angelo Hayes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hayes v. United States, No. 2:14-cv-00532-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Winchaus Hayes v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 20, 2016
Citation: 671 F. App'x 228
Docket Number: 16-7435
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.