In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Dimitra Kustas appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Dillon, J.), dated May 15, 2003, as denied that branch of her motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
A property owner is not liable in negligence unless he or she created the allegedly dangerous condition or had actual or constructive notice of its existence (see Voss v D&C Parking,
Here, the defendant Dimitra Kustas failed to meet her prima facie burden on her motion for summary judgment of showing that she did not retain control over the subject premises and, in
Therefore, the burden did not shift to the plaintiffs to raise a triable issue of fact (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,
