History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wilson v. Tiffany
3 Wend. 310
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1829
Check Treatment

Service of papers on motions. In this case, notice of a mofjon for a commission to examine witnesses was given, . , _ . , , , r From the jurat to the affidavits produced to the court, it apPeared that it was sworn to subsequent to the time of service of what purported to be a copy on the opposite party. This wag 0¡3jecte¿t0 as irregular, and so held by the court, who said that though, under the circumstances of this case, they *311would grant thé motions such objection, in any case subsequently arising, would be sustained.*

Hatch Cambreling, for the motion.

J. R. Van Duzer, contra.

A case subsequently came before the court, in which the same question arose, and they refused to entertain the motion.

Case Details

Case Name: Wilson v. Tiffany
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1829
Citation: 3 Wend. 310
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.