32 Ga. App. 310 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1924
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
It is necessary only to discuss the ruling stated in the second headnote. This ease in its facts is somewhat similar to that of Gillespie v. Mullally, 30 Ga. App. 118 (117 S. E. 98). The first
The verdict for the defendant was properly directed.
<Judgment affirmed.