163 S.E. 125 | S.C. | 1932
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *139
March 9, 1932. The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This cause has been before this Court on two previous occasions. The first time it related to security for costs, and the decision is reported in
Following the decision of this Court as to the demurrer (Wilson v. Wilson,
The cause being in equity, it is our duty to review the findings of fact, as well as the legal conclusions, of the Circuit Judge, keeping in mind, however, the rule, repeatedly announced, that it is incumbent on the appellants to satisfy this Court that the trial Judge committed error in his findings of fact.
A careful examination of the record has not convinced us of any error in any finding of fact on the part of the Circuit Judge, and we are entirely satisfied with his legal conclusions.
The decree appealed from, which will be reported, is affirmed.
MESSRS. JUSTICES STABLER, CARTER and BONHAM concur. *161