History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wilson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
66 N.Y.2d 988
NY
1985
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (111 AD2d 807).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.

Case Details

Case Name: Wilson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 19, 1985
Citation: 66 N.Y.2d 988
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.