History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wilson v. Mann
37 Okla. 475
Okla.
1913
Check Treatment

The petition in error in this case was filed in this court on June 20, 1911, and the only assignment of error therein is as follows:

"Said Robert Wilson avers that there is error in said record and proceedings in this, to wit, that said court erred in its judgment and final order in this case, made and entered on the 2d day of February, A.D. 1911, which said judgment and order is in the words and figures following, to wit."

Then follows a copy of the journal entry of the judgment.

This assignment of error presents nothing for the consideration of this court. From it plaintiff's particular grievance does not appear. The specification of error is merely equivalent to saying that the court erred in rendering a judgment for one party and against the other.

To be availing the petition in error should, in an orderly and specific manner, clearly point out the error or errors complained of and sought to be reviewed. The general allegation that the court erred in rendering a particular judgment, setting it out, is not sufficient. Board of Com'rs v. Oxley,8 Okla. 502, 58 P. 651; Willet v. Johnson 13 Okla. 563,76 P. 174; Gill v. Haynes, 28 Okla. 656, 115 P. 790; De Vitt v. ElReno, 28 Okla. 315, 114 P. 253.

There being nothing for this court to review, the case should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered. *Page 477

Case Details

Case Name: Wilson v. Mann
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: May 20, 1913
Citation: 37 Okla. 475
Docket Number: 2758
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.