*2 Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, WILCOX, MCLEOD, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no rever- sible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. See Wilson v. Lambert, No. CA-96-662-4-18BE (D.S.C. July 15, 1997); Wilson v. Gregg, No. CA-97-611-4-18BE (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 1997). [*] We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[*] Although the district court found that Wilson failed to timely object to the magistrate judge’s report in the action against Lambert, we do not rely on waiver as a ground for our affirmance.