Wilson v. Lambert

97-7061 | 4th Cir. | Jan 22, 1998

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patrick Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, WILCOX, MCLEOD, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no rever- sible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. See Wilson v. Lambert, No. CA-96-662-4-18BE (D.S.C. July 15, 1997); Wilson v. Gregg, No. CA-97-611-4-18BE (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 1997). [*] We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

NOTES

[*] Although the district court found that Wilson failed to timely object to the magistrate judge’s report in the action against Lambert, we do not rely on waiver as a ground for our affirmance.