History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wilson v. Keystone Insurance
321 Pa. Super. 495
Pa. Super. Ct.
1983
Check Treatment

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue in this appeal is whether basic loss benefits under the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act may be “stacked.” We have held up disposition of this appeal until the issue could be determined by this court en banc, which has now held that basic loss benefits may not be stacked. Antanovich v. Allstate Insurance Company, 320 Pa.Super.Ct. 322, 467 A.2d 345 (1983). Since the court below computed the amounts the insurance company was ordered to pay under the assumption that benefits may be stacked, we must vacate the order and remand with a direction to recompute the benefits in accordance with Antanovich v. Allstate Insurance Company, supra.

Order vacated, and case remanded with instructions. Jurisdiction is relinquished.

Case Details

Case Name: Wilson v. Keystone Insurance
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 16, 1983
Citation: 321 Pa. Super. 495
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1296
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.