129 P. 617 | Cal. Ct. App. | 1912
This is an action based upon a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant by the supreme court of the state of Vermont. *493
Judgment went for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals upon the judgment-roll accompanied by a bill of exceptions.
The existence of the judgment alleged in the complaint was by the answer denied. To prove the allegation plaintiff offered in evidence an exemplified copy of a document purporting to constitute the record of the proceedings had in the courts of Vermont and the judgment herein sued upon.
No evidence was offered tending to prove the laws of Vermont. In the absence of such proof, the laws of another state will be presumed to be the same as our own, and this rule applies to statutory as well as the common law. (Cavallaro v. Texas Ry.Co.,
"Know ye, that having inspected the records and proceedings in the office of the clerk of our supreme court for the county of Windsor, we do there find remaining a certain original record of judgment, . . . in an action brought by C. C. Ellis (plaintiff's intestate) vs. Daniel Durkee, in the words and figures following, to wit: . . . And at the term of the honorable supreme court aforesaid, to wit: on the day and year last aforesaid, said cause is duly entered in said supreme court, and the parties come by their respective attorneys, to be heard upon the exceptions of the defendant, as in his bill, *494 now here remaining on file, fully and at large doth appear; whereupon, the parties having been fully heard, as well the plaintiff as the defendant, upon said judgment and exceptions, and mature deliberation being thereupon had.
"It is considered and adjudged by the court here that the judgment of the honorable county court in this cause be reversed, and that the said plaintiff, administrator, have and recover of the said defendant the sum of three thousand and three hundred and fifty dollars and sixty-six cents, with interest on said sum from the twenty-sixth day of June, A.D. 1906, being $65.34, and costs in the court below, which costs have heretofore been taxed and allowed in said county court at the sum of thirty-six dollars and sixty cents, making in the whole the sum of three thousand four hundred and fifty-two dollars and sixty cents, damages and interest and costs, for which the said plaintiff, administrator, may have execution against the said defendant.
"A true record.
"Attest: JAY REED PEMBER, Clerk."
Conceding that in order to render the judgment effectual as an instrument upon which to base a suit it must have been entered by the clerk of the court wherein it was given, in a book kept by him for the purpose, all as required by section
The judgment is affirmed.
Allen, P. J., and James, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 1, 1913.