Wilson v. District Court

95 N.J.L. 265 | N.J. | 1920

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. '' - ‘

For affirmance — The Chibe Justice, Swayze, TreN-CHARD, BERGEN, IÍALISCH, BLACK, KaTZENBACPI, Wl-IITE, HePPENI-IEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.