Wilson v. District Court95 N.J.L. 265 N.J.1920Check Treatment Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. '' - ‘ For affirmance — The Chibe Justice, Swayze, TreN-CHARD, BERGEN, IÍALISCH, BLACK, KaTZENBACPI, Wl-IITE, HePPENI-IEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.