This is an action on a benefit certificate issued by a frаternal beneficiary association wherein plaintiff seeks to recover indemnity for permanent totаl disability as therein provided. The defense is based on the falsity of the answers made by plaintiff to certain questions propounded to him in his application for membership, which by the terms of the application itself he wаrranted to be strictly true. As bearing on such defense it aрpears that defendant has not deposited in court for the benefit of plaintiff, nor tendered or offered to return, the payments received from him.
Defendant (appellant here) asserts that as it is a fraternal beneficiary association and the action is on оne of its benefit certificates, Sections 6142 and 6145, Revisеd Statutes 1919, statutes relating to life insurance generally, аre without application; and hence the false answers avoid the contract of insurance, regardless of their materiality; and such defense can be mаde without an offer to return-the premium's. Respondent on the other hands contends.: (1) that, notwithstanding appellаnt was organized, chartered and licensed as a frаternal beneficiary association, the contrаct in suit was not such a one as a fraternal benefiсiary association is entitled to issue and for that reаson appellant when sued on it cannot invoke exemption from the general insurance laws of the Stаte; and (2) that regardless of any statute on the subject аn insurance company cannot, under the generаl law, defend an action on one of its policies on the ground that false representations were made in its procurement, unless it returns, or offers to return, the premiums received.
*659
The case comes here on the certification of the St. Louis Court of Appeals. The opinion accompanying it is the second one handed down by that court; it was concurred in by all of the judges, but the cause was transferred here because it was deemed that the decision was in conflict with that оf the Kansas City Court of Appeals in Harland v. Insurance Co.,