midpage

Wilson v. AnthonyWilson v. Anthony

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 1, 1909
Versions:78 A. 1135
5 Buchanan 299
75 N.J. Eq. 299
1909 N.J. LEXIS 310
Per Curiam.

Vice-Chancellor Howell having denied an application for preliminary injunction in this case (Wilson v. Anthony, 72 N. J. Eq. (2 Buch.) 836), the defendant demurred to the bill, and, upon hearing, the demurrer was sustained and the bill dismissed. From the decree dismissing the bill the present appeal is taken.

The decree of dismissal should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed by Vice-Chancellor Howell in denying the application for injunction.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill—15. For reversal—None.

Case Details

Case Name: Wilson v. Anthony
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 1, 1909
Citations: 78 A. 1135; 5 Buchanan 299; 75 N.J. Eq. 299; 1909 N.J. LEXIS 310
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
Log In