History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wilson v. American Chain & Cable Co.
38 F.R.D. 72
E.D. Pa.
1965
Check Treatment
WOOD, District Judge.

The plaintiff, following trial, and after judgment was entered for the defendant on the jury’s verdict, has moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and in the alternative for a new trial. At the close of all the evidence the plaintiff never moved for a directed verdict under Rule 50(a). This step is mandatory before a jury’s findings can be attacked by any post-trial motion. Brandon v. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co., 220 F.Supp. 855 (E.D.Pa.1963) aff’d per curiam 342 F.2d 519 (3 Cir. 1965). We cannot accord the effect of a directed verdict to the plaintiff’s points for charge. Massaro v. United States Lines Co., 307 F.2d 299 (3 Cir. 1962); Eisenberg v. Smith, 263 F.2d 827, 829 (3 Cir. 1959).

After consideration of the plaintiff’s motion for new trial we find no merit in the allegations contained therein, and the motion, accordingly, is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Wilson v. American Chain & Cable Co.
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 20, 1965
Citation: 38 F.R.D. 72
Docket Number: Civ. A. No. 28172
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.